ABSTRACT
Objective: Is to find out which revascularization methods have less of risk factors and complications after the surgery and long-term period. Method(s): From January 2018 to December 2019 were operated 134 patients with LAD CTO. 48 of them underwent MIDCAB: 36 (75%) males and 12 (25%) females;aged 58.7 +/-8.7;7 (14.6%) with previous diabetes;10 (20.8%) with previous PCI of LAD with drug-eluting stent. In the PCI group there were 86 patients: 52 (60.5%) males and 34 (39.5%) females;aged 64.8 +/-8.3;23 (26.7%) with previous diabetes. Result(s): Hospital mortality was 0 (0%) in MIDCAB unlike 1 (1.2%) in PCI. Myocardial infarction was 0 (0%) in both the groups. In MIDCAB the number of conversions to onpump and sternotomy was 0 (0%), there were 6 (12.5%) pleuritis with pleural puncture and 3 (6.2%) with long wound-aches. The hospitalization period was 10.7+/-2.9 days for MIDCAB and 9.9 +/-3.9 days for PCI. In the PCI group 2.0 +/-1.0 drug-eluting stents were used. In-hospital costs were higher for PCI 3809 unlike 3258 for MIDCAB. After one year in MIDCAB group died 2 (4.2%) patients, from noncardiac causes. In PCI group died 3 (3.5%) patients, all from cardiac causes. Because of pandemic COVID-19 were checked only 48 patients by angiography and general clinical examination: 25 after MIDCAB and 23 after PCI. 5 patients have a graft failure, caused by surgical mistakes. 4 patients have stents restenosis and 1 has LAD's reocclusion. Conclusion(s): Both methods of revascularization for LAD CTO are demonstrated similar results. EuroSCORE II (P = 0.008) and glomerular filtrating rate (P = 0.004) are significant potential risk factors for mortality in both groups, age is potential risk factor for graft failure (P = 0.05). Dyslipidemia is significant risk factor for LAD restenosis in PCI group (P = 0.02). MIDCAB is associated with lower incidence of revascularization repeat and in-hospital mortality in the literature data and it costs lower than PCI for LAD CTO as our study has shown.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Prognosis after vertebrobasilar stenting (VBS) may differ from that after carotid artery stenting (CAS). Here, we directly compared the incidence and predictors of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction after VBS and compared them with those of CAS. METHODS: We enrolled patients who underwent VBS or CAS. Clinical variables and procedure-related factors were obtained. During the 3 years of follow-up, in-stent restenosis and infarction were investigated in each group. In-stent restenosis was defined as reduction in the lumen diameter > 50% compared with that after stenting. Factors associated with the occurrence of in-stent restenosis and stented-territory infarction in VBS and CAS were compared. RESULTS: Among 417 stent insertions (93 VBS and 324 CAS), there was no statistical difference in in-stent restenosis between VBS and CAS (12.9% vs. 6.8%, P = 0.092). However, stented-territory infarction was more frequently observed in VBS than in CAS (22.6% vs. 10.8%; P = 0.006), especially a month after stent insertion. HbA1c level, clopidogrel resistance, and multiple stents in VBS and young age in CAS increased the risk of in-stent restenosis. Diabetes (3.82 [1.24-11.7]) and multiple stents (22.4 [2.4-206.4]) were associated with stented-territory infarction in VBS. However, in-stent restenosis (odds ratio: 15.1, 95% confidence interval: 3.17-72.2) was associated with stented-territory infarction in CAS. CONCLUSIONS: Stented-territory infarction occurred more frequently in VBS, especially after the periprocedural period. In-stent restenosis was associated with stented-territory infarction after CAS, but not in VBS. The mechanism of stented-territory infarction after VBS may be different from that after CAS.
Subject(s)
Carotid Stenosis , Coronary Restenosis , Humans , Carotid Stenosis/epidemiology , Carotid Stenosis/surgery , Stents/adverse effects , Carotid Arteries , Constriction, Pathologic , Infarction , Treatment Outcome , Recurrence , Risk Factors , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-2019 pandemic continues to restrict access to endoscopy, resulting in delays or cancellation of non-urgent endoscopic procedures. A delay in the removal or exchange of plastic biliary stents may lead to stent occlusion with consensus recommendation of stent removal or exchange at three-month intervals [1-4]. We postulated that delayed plastic biliary stent removal (DPBSR) would increase complication rates. Aims: We aim to report our single-centre experience with complications arising from DPBSR. Methods: This was a retrospective, single-center, observational cohort study. All subjects who had ERCP-guided plastic biliary stent placement in Halifax, Nova Scotia between Dec 2019 and June 2020 were included in the study. DPBSR was defined as stent removal >=90 days from insertion. Four endpoints were assigned to patients: 1. Stent removed endoscopically, 2. Died with stent in-situ (measured from stent placement to documented date of death/last clinical encounter before death), 3. Pending removal (subjects clinically well, no liver enzyme elevation, not expired, endpoint 1 Nov 2020), and 4. Complication requiring urgent reintervention. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to represent duration of stent patency (Fig.1). Results: 102 (47.2%) had plastic biliary stents placed between 2/12/2019 and 29/6/2020. 49 (48%) were female, and the median age was 68 (R 16-91). Median follow-up was 167.5 days, 60 (58.8%) subjects had stent removal, 12 (11.8%) died before replacement, 21 (20.6%) were awaiting stent removal with no complications (median 230d, R 30-332), 9 (8.8%) had complications requiring urgent ERCP. Based on death reports, no deaths were related to stent-related complications. 72(70.6%) of patients had stents in-situ for >= 90 days. In this population, median time to removal was 211.5d (R 91-441d). 3 (4.2%) subjects had stent-related complications requiring urgent ERCP, mean time to complication was 218.3d (R 94-441). Stent removal >=90 days was not associated with complications such as occlusion, cholangitis, and migration (p=1.0). Days of stent in-situ was not associated with occlusion, cholangitis, and migration (p=0.57). Sex (p=0.275), cholecystectomy (p=1.0), cholangiocarcinoma (p=1.0), cholangitis (p=0.68) or pancreatitis (p=1.0) six weeks prior to ERCP, benign vs. malignant etiology (p=1.0) were not significantly associated with stent-related complications. Conclusions: Plastic biliary stent longevity may have been previously underestimated. The findings of this study agree with CAG framework recommendations [5] that stent removal be prioritized as elective (P3). Limitations include small sample size that could affect Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Despite prolonged indwelling stent time as a result of COVID-19, we did not observe an increased incidence of stent occlusion or other complications.
ABSTRACT
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic originated from Wuhan, China, in late 2019. In addition to the respiratory system, COVID-19 also affects other organ systems. The disease can lead to cardiovascular complications such as myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, acute heart failure, and venous thromboembolism; patients with COVID-19 experience more thrombotic events than non-COVID-19 patients. A 50-year-old male cigarette smoker presented to the emergency department (ED) with typical chest pain. His electrocardiography (ECG) showed an anterior STEMI. He developed multiple episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF) and received defibrillator shocks. His angiogram showed thrombotic severe in-stent restenosis (ISR) of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery stents. A 70-year-old diabetic hypertensive woman presented to the ED with dyspnea and chest pain. The patient had undergone angioplasty two times beforehand, and a fresh angiogram revealed severe thrombotic ISR of LAD stents and another far midpart lesion after the stents. She underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). A 54-year-old man presented to the ED with typical chest pain commencing an hour beforehand. He had undergone angioplasty about 10 years earlier. The patient received the Oxford/AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine 36 h before developing chest pain. The ECG revealed an infero-posterior STEMI, and the angiogram depicted thrombotic occluded ISR in the RCA. The patient underwent successful PCI. Patients with COVID-19 or even with COVID-19 vaccination experience stent thrombosis due to a hypercoagulable state. Hence, we need standard guidelines to prevent stent thrombosis.
ABSTRACT
In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a critical drawback of coronary stents, although initially described as benign, guidelines both support the use of intravascular imaging in the diagnosis and treatment of stent failure (Class IIa);however, our case highlights the limitation of optical coherence tomography in the assessment of the ISR (stent failure), it also highlights the association of self-limited severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 illness and an acute coronary syndrome ISR presentation.
ABSTRACT
Background: Moderate to severe coronary calcification results in suboptimal results with increased risk of procedural and future adverse events. Newer high-pressure balloons and atherectomy devices have not shown any superiority over the routine high pressure balloon dilatation. Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is the latest technique for treatment of moderate to severe calcific coronary artery disease. IVL converts the electrical energy into mechanical energy with cracking of calcium in both adventitia and intima. DISRUPT CAD III study has shown the short-term outcomes of Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL). However, the experience is limited with this new technique especially for mid-term and long-term outcomes. The Coronary IVL System is a proprietary balloon catheter system designed to enhance stent outcomes by enabling delivery of the calcium disrupting capability of lithotripsy prior to balloon dilatation at low pressures. The Coronary IVL System consists of an IVL Balloon Catheter with two integrated pairs of lithotripsy emitters, a Lithotripsy Generator, and Connector Cable. Methods: Our study is a single centre, observational study done at Apollo hospitals, Visakhapatnam, India, to evaluate the safety, mid-term and long-term effectiveness of Intravascular Lithotripsy (IVL). Subjects who are more than 18 years of age with moderate to severe calcification which require Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and are willing to participate in the study are included. Baseline parameters were assessed. Procedural success was defined as no residual stenosis of <30% after stenting. Procedural and postprocedural complications were noted. Usage of adjuvant Atherectomy balloons or devices is noted. Both clinical and angiographic follow up was done. Clinical follow up parameters assessed were MACE which includes cardiac death, MI, target vessel revascularisation (TVR), Target lesion revascularisation (TVR). Any admissions for heart failure or change in functional class are also noted. On follow up, Angiographic assessment was done for In-stent restenosis (>50%) or In segment restenosis (>50%) or any fresh coronary lesions which mandates revascularisation. Results: Out of 35 subjects, only 2 were females. Mean age was 69.9 ± 2.8 years. 15 (42.8%) subjects were Diabetics and 17 (48.5%) were Hypertensives. 2 subjects underwent previous CABG surgery. 10 subjects had left ventricular dysfunction. 2 subjects had renal dysfunction. 29 (82.8%) subjects presented with Acute MI out of which 22 were presented with NSTEMI. 1 subject underwent the procedure during Primary PTCA successfully. Total number of stents implanted were4 1 with a mean stent implantation was 1.17. Rotablation system (Boston Scientific) was used in 2 subjects prior to IVL where the intimal calcium was extensive. OPN NC balloon (Translumina Therapeutics) was used in 6 subjects. Mean stent length was 35.9 ± 9.8 mm. Mean number of pulses delivered was 7.3 ± 1.4. All the subjects had good procedural outcomes with no residual stenosis. Only 1 subject had coronary dissection after IVL which could be stented successfully. 1 subject had an aneurysm in the proximal LAD which could be stented. Subjects were followed up clinically for a mean of 6.23 months. No MACEs were noted. None of them had any Heart failure admissions. 1 subject died of noncardiac cause (respiratory failure due to COVID-19 pneumonia). 7 patients followed up angiographically after a mean follow up of 9.4 months. No significant ISR was noted in any of them. 1 subject underwent repeat target vessel revascularisation (TVR). Another subject underwent revascularisation to another vessel which was planned earlier. Conclusion: Coronary Intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) is a safe and effective method in the treatment of moderate to severe coronary calcific coronary artery disease which is safe and effective with good short-term and mid-term outcomes. However, the data is limited on long-term outcomes.